S.7 (vi) re the Praya Reclamation
dated 16th July 1889 said
"In case signify
any
violence shall not
his acceptance
he shall have no claim to any compensation in respect of depreciation of his lot or works, but the Government may if he thinks fit award to him
such a sum
of money
as consideration for his lease
or such a
new land
may in his absolute discretion
he
think sufficient
as and by way of
#7, Castle Terrace,
182
C.O.
27223
Isle of Wight
1st August 1904
The Under Secretary of State,
Sir,
Cowes,
I have the honour to acknowledge the receipt of your letter No. 25299/1904, under date 28th July, written by Mr. H. Bertram Cox by direction of Mr. Secretary Lyttelton,
informing me that the decision given by the Governor as arbitrator in the matter of compensation for our Marine Lot No. 184 must conclude the matter.
To conclude the matter before compensation has been properly ascertained and paid, and to refuse my request to have it ascertained upon the principle laid down by Her late Majesty's Government in 1857, which principle is in accord with that of the Imperial Legislature of the present day, is not what I expected from the representative of His Majesty, the fountain of justice.
way of compensation for any injury that such level have sustained by the so works"
The Court in Strong Kong deater
that the order was within the competing of the legislature
The Privy Council refused spent
leve & afferal sapie
decision of the for
having an
that the
was final
be
absolute discretion would
whi no C+ glaw
wd interfere
For the first time it is now admitted that the decision of the Governor was given as Arbitrator,
and Chief Justice Sir John Carrington has stated that the Attorney General of Hong Kong very properly admitted that if the Governor is indeed an Arbitrator under the Ordinance, some of the things which are stated to have been done by the Acting Governor cannot be supported; and Mr. C. A. Crippa, K.C. has said that on the admitted facts, the Chief Justice should have set aside the Award.
The decision now under consideration has been arrived at under like conditions as the first, without hearing us,
and Mr. Secretary Lyttelton refuses to state the reasons put forward against our claim
matter.
S.7 (vi)g the Praya Reclamation
adre 16071889 said
"I case signify
any
lence shall not
his acceptame
he shall have no claim to any compensation in perfect gary depreciation of his lot Greason gitte & works, but the Governs may if he thinks fit award to him.
s?
such a sum
gmoney
Cour lease.
д
or such a
new land
may in his absolute discretion
Garz
he
2.
think sufficient
as and by
#
7, Castle Terrace,
182
C.O.
27223
Isle of Wight o
1st. August 1904. LE 2 AS 24
The Under Secretary of State,
sir,
Colonial Office.
حال
Cowes,
I have the honour to acknowledge the receipt of
letter No. 25299/1904, under date 28th. July, written by
Mr. H. Bertram Cox by direction of Hr. Secretary Lyttelton,
informing me that the decision given by the Governor as
arbitrator in the matter of compensation for our Marine
Lot No. 184 must conclude the matter.
To conclude the matter before compensation has
been properly ascertained and paid, and to refuse my request
to have it ascertained upon the principle laid down by Her late Majesty's Government in 1857, which principle is
in accord with that of the Imperial Legislature of the present day, is not what I expected from the representative
of His Majesty, the fountain of justice.
woy of compensation for any injury that such leve
have sustained by t
may
the so works"
The Ct in Stong Kone deater
that the order was within the
competing of the legislature
The Privy Connal refused spent
leve & afferal sapie
decision of the for
having an
that the
was final
be
absolute discretion would
whi no C+ glaw
wd interfere
4763
48
49669
3.
4.
For the first time it is now admitted that the
decision of the Governor was given as Arbitrator,
and
Chief Justice Sir John Carrington has stated that the Attorney General of Hong Kong very properly admitted that if the Governor is indeed an Arbitrator under the Ordinance,
some of the things whic" are stated to have been done by the Acting Governor cannot be supported; and Mr. C. A. Crippa, K.C. has said that on the admitted facts, the Chief
Justice should have set aside the Award.
The decision now under consideration has been
arrived at under like conditions as the first, without
hearing us,
and Mr. Secretary Lyttelton refuses to state
the reasons put forward against our claim
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.